Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Shortage of "economically attractive" men reason for marriage decline according to new study"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I married someone outside of my “comfort zone” because I simply wasn’t having any success with my initial criteria. I ended up with someone from a different region (NE vs south) and a different religion. Ideally I would have found someone my religion in my hometown (a mid sized city.) It has worked out but has required much compromise. But what in life doesn’t?[/quote] I think there is compromise always, but when one person carries the other financially it can be a burden. I have been in relationships where my goals financially and career wise are light years ahead and eventually those relationships fell apart because I wasn't meeting my goals because I was carrying them. Compromising on religion or politics, I could live with. [/quote] It’s only a burden for women. Historically, men have nearly always financially carried women.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
