Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Jobs and Careers
Reply to "Google male engineeer saying female engineers shouldn't be engineers"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] saying that women are biologically less suited for the job and leadership is overt discrimination. [/quote] Do you understand the difference between "may in part explain" and are? They don't mean the same thing. There is a difference for example between the statement, growing up in a single parent home results in poverty and growing up in a single parent home may in part result in poverty. [/quote] You're sad. Under the law, "may in part" is overt. This isn't your freshman year philosophy class. You are not as smart as you think you are. [/quote] Can you explain further? I have an engineering background and work in patent law and when I see the words "in part" I interpret it as not 100%, but some quantity between 1-99%/[/quote] ok dimwit. saying someone is IN PART unable to do the job due to their gender is overt. "Overt" does not mean "the only reason." Imagine if someone said [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
