Reply to ICE Shooting in Minneapolis

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "ICE Shooting in Minneapolis "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Here is what will happen.

The US Attorney will decline to indict.

Minnesota will indict.  The US Attorney will invoke the federal officer removal statute and will then dismiss the charges.  Alternatively, Ross will have it removed.

2029.  New president.  Ross will be fired.  Minnesota will revitalize the murder charges against Ross.  Ross will try to remove.  But, Mark Meadows already tried this, invoking the statute AFTER your term as a federal officer is over, and was shot down by the 11th Circuit and the US Supreme Court declined to hear the appeal, letting the 11th Circuit decision stand.

Ross will then face charges before a jury of his Minnesota peers and will have an opportunity to present self-defense as an affirmative defense. He will have the burden of proving that defense and convincing a jury of his peers that his actions were proper.

Then he will either walk free or join Derek Chauvin. [/quote]

The removal to federal court will stand as an available option indefinitely because [b]the activity in question occurred when the actor was a federal officer engaged in federal law enforcement activity.[/b]  Local authorities cannot obstruct or second guess such federal activity at the time or any time thereafter.  It doesn't matter if a new federal administration eventually appears, or whether the officer eventually retires or changes jobs.  What matters is what his status was at the time of the incident.  [/quote]
There’s an argument that shooting in that situation does not represent legitimate law enforcement activity, and that jumping out on a lady because she wasn’t parked the way they’d like also wasn’t legitimate law enforcement activity. [/quote]

It was legitimate.  They were on duty, moving as a convoy- many vehicles and personal. Not only was she clogging the road and obstructing traffic, her vehicle being perpendicular in the road (and taunting/harassing) presents a safety and security risk for their convoy to
pass. It was completely appropriate and legitimate for them to tell her to move and arrest her when she wouldn’t.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics