Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "ICE Shooting in Minneapolis "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Reasonable doubt...you people are such clowns. Yes, a bunch of lay people who are not cops and not lawyers look at videos and read comments and make the judgment THEY WOULD HAVE MADE ANYWAY. A jury would be told explicitly what they may consider, and would be presented with days worth of evidence. But this reckless and trigger-happy Ross idiot will likely never see a trial. [/quote] Why would he be put on trial? He didn’t break any law.[/quote] See, that’s the kind of thing that gets determined in court. That’s how this whole thing works, with laws and stuff.[/quote] Well, State lacks jurisdiction and feds will not bring charges or seek indictment.[/quote] That’s not a true. Besides, there is no statute of limitations. Minnesota said that they will wait out the administration if they need to. [/quote] They don’t need to wait until the current administration is gone to file charges. In fact, the hurdles to a successful state prosecution will be higher in 2029 than they are in 2026.[/quote] But he would have the right to a [b]speedy trial[/b]. The state can claim they did not have access to evidence until X date. [/quote] That comes AFTER indictment.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics