Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I mean, the woman who texts her coworker, “ f you knew me (in person) longer you’d have a sense of how flirty and yummy the ball busting will play. It’s my love language. Spicy and playfully bold, never with teeth” is going to have an uphill battle convincing a jury  that the use of the word “sexy”  or “ she doesn’t watch porn” creates a hostile work environment.[/quote]

Luckily, she does not have to prove that. Just that she subjectively believed it and reported it, which the defendants admit she did in several text messages.[/quote]

You guys are out of your mind. Discovery is broader than the evidence that will be admitted at trial. The judge has narrowed the case to breach of contract retaliation claims. That’s what’s left. The trial will be about whether the cra was indeed breached a year and a half after it was signed. The judge is not going to allow weeks of testimony on SH claims he threw out. And no one is going to want to testify for Blake given how things are going.[/quote]

There are 3 claims left, including retaliation under FEHA, not just the contract claim.

I don't see how you get to retaliation without presenting the case on what the protected activity was and what caused it. Wayfarer won't be able to avoid evidence of Heath and Baldoni's behavior and of the complaints and discussions surrounding it (the 17 point list, the all hands meeting, etc).[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics