Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]lol this ended up exactly as I predicted at the beginning - harassment claims dismissed but retaliation going to the fact finder. [/quote] Kind of brilliant legal move because there's no need to have any actual harassment, only retaliation (e.g. defense against) harassment claims, whether or not true[/quote] This isn’t correct, Blake will have to convince the jury that her complaints of a hostile work environment were reasonable. The judge threw out a bunch of them, she has left the birthing scene, use of the word sexy by Baldoni, Baldoni allegedly telling crew she didn’t watch pornography and Jamie in the trailer. Opinion, page 116[/quote] Adding, as noted before, in evaluating what conduct she can use for hostile environment, the judge only looked at Blake’s allegations, not WF’s versions, and for purposes of the motion, assumed them to be true in their entirety. Even with that advantage, only these advanced.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics