Reply to Trapped/Re-aging Families, How are you having the conversation?

Forum Index » Soccer

Reply to "Trapped/Re-aging Families, How are you having the conversation?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Hahahaha maybe you should read the papers so its not so easy to make you look stupid.

"So, while the US also uses the calendar year to determine age groups for youth players, the inevitably smaller pool of children willing/able to pay for youth soccer may cause the more balanced distribution we have witnessed above"[/quote]

the above sentence is why the paper needed to be peer reviewed, because it suggests the author was unaware of the age registration change.[/quote]
Im surprised you didnt slip rae into that excuse somehow.[/quote]

It's a fascinating set of data but more needs to be done to understand why the numbers are they way they are. The author provides a theory BUT at best he doesn't address the SY/BY switch. That's a potential flaw in his reasoning and he should have at least discussed it, especially if aware, like he did with other possible reasons for the numbers. [/quote]In his defense, he is a data scientist, his goal is to use a few charts to show lines going up and down to show what is happening. He isn't pupporting to understand why something is happening, he is merely speculating which he freely admits. Causation isn't in his occupation.[/quote]

More than fair. We're lucky he looked at it and it showed some interesting trends that confirmed a lot of other studies but raised new questions. and in a way, we're crowdsourcing some review, although I'm not sure I could say I'm a peer.[/quote]I'm sure the dude who find incredibly fascinating that a group of randos is parsing his chart like it is the map to a treasure chest.[/quote]
The author looked at something through the lense of data only. Unfortunately doing so stepped on the religion of rae. Which means the "its everyone' else's fault gamg" will be out with pitchforks. [/quote]
If only the rae people would spend time with their kids practicing and getting better instead of ranting online about how its everyone else's fault but their own.[/quote]The RAE talk isn't a fraction of the whining to go school year grades and how the sky will fall if it doesn't happen, and pleading for someone to actually side with Aug poster.[/quote]
No clue

[img]https://media3.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTZjMDliOTUyNjl0ZmI2YWJwdWgxeGdpbmtwcGtuNDFyZW8xdnBoNmR6Z2swajN0OSZlcD12MV9pbnRlcm5hbF9naWZfYnlfaWQmY3Q9Zw/9jWvoVpRRq4vUaxG1Z/giphy.gif[/img][/quote] Well, someone did take their ball away and start a new thread to ban your hot topic of trying to force kids to play up an age group. That wasn't a clue to you that you were craping posting so much that nobody wanted to see your mumblings about grades mattering for anything?[/quote]
No really you make no sense

[img]https://www.reddit.com/media?url=https%3A%2F%2Fi.redd.it%2Fbipl7190960f1.gif[/img][/quote]

The grade topic WAS banned from the new thread.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics