Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Wasn't it dismissed because she was determined to be an independent contractor and not an employee?[/quote] Partially but he had facts that would have let him write a legally defensible argument either way on the issue of whether she was an independent contracto. I don’t think he would have gotten rid of all her sexual harassment allegations if he felt they were strong and deserving of a remedy, and his statements at the hearing made clear he didn’t think her harassment claims were strong.[/quote] The Blake stans are making it sound like it's all because she's an independent contractor.[/quote] Look at the post above, he directly addressed the merits of her sexual harassment claims.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
