Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
DC Public and Public Charter Schools
Reply to "School residency cheaters investigated"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm also not crying racism. Am more of a wasp than anyone named Rosiak. But it is not okay to stall children. It is not okay to follow someone who "might" be guilty. The things the daily caller article you wrote listed as "proof" aren't even proof. The woman was at her ex's house at 6am? So? She drove in early to beat traffic. [u]She declared bankruptcy in 1999, and although that means nothing in 2016, it makes her look bad so you threw it in.[/u] There's no actual proof in the article. I think you probably just got your own employer sued. I am sure it won't be the last time.[/quote] I assume the point about bankruptcy and collections actions was in the article because if you look at the court docket sheets under her name, you'll see her Maryland address is listed in those cases. Try it yourself - http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch//inquiry-index.jsp[/quote] Six cases spanning a 15-year period, all brought against her as a defendant in courts in PG County -- such suits are usually brought where the defendant resides. [/quote] And if she moved to DC in September, or December, or yesterday, her kids would be entitled to go to DC schools. Period. The end. Your "facts" are as "factual" as the 30k a year that the taxpayers pay for DC children. Not the right number either.[/quote] So why wouldn't she tell the reporter that she just signed a lease in DC in December, or yesterday? If I knew a reporter was getting ready to publish something awful and untrue about me, I would either cooperate and show them they were wrong or get a lawyer involved if they really pissed me off. Not complain afterwards that it was unfair. [/quote] I'm not her. I'm sure she's getting a lawyer. [/quote] And what would be her claim? That someone violated her right of privacy to commit fraud? :lol: [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics