Reply to School residency cheaters investigated

Forum Index » DC Public and Public Charter Schools

Reply to "School residency cheaters investigated"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I'm also not crying racism. Am more of a wasp than anyone named Rosiak.

But it is not okay to stall children. It is not okay to follow someone who "might" be guilty. The things the daily caller article you wrote listed as "proof" aren't even proof. The woman was at her ex's house at 6am? So? She drove in early to beat traffic. [u]She declared bankruptcy in 1999, and although that means nothing in 2016, it makes her look bad so you threw it in.[/u] There's no actual proof in the article. I think you probably just got your own employer sued. I am sure it won't be the last time.[/quote]

I assume the point about bankruptcy and collections actions was in the article because if you look at the court docket sheets under her name, you'll see her Maryland address is listed in those cases.  Try it yourself - http://casesearch.courts.state.md.us/casesearch//inquiry-index.jsp[/quote]

Six cases spanning a 15-year period, all brought against her as a defendant in courts in PG County -- such suits are usually brought where the defendant resides.   [/quote]

And if she moved to DC in September, or December, or yesterday, her kids would be entitled to go to DC schools. Period. The end. Your "facts" are as "factual" as the 30k a year that the taxpayers pay for DC children. Not the right number either.[/quote]

Always plausible rationales, always excuses.  The reporters tracked her home.  If she has proof that she's a DC resident, then produce it.

[/quote]

One little known fact to many "investigative" journalists never actually took any journalism courses during their time at uva, is that no one is required by law to comply with a journalist's demands. Indeed, based on the reputation of the paper in question, one assumes one would be better off Not complying and then suing later.  I know, if a reporter from the daily caller asked me anything, I'd laugh in their face and ask them if being a hack paid well enough to put up with that kind of bs assignment.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics