Reply to Second round options for Woodward boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I like option B. Balances everyone needs. Just go with that one. option B = option best.

[/quote]

B and C are the wacky ones for us, but I get that this is super local.

We were untouched by the first boundary study.[/quote]

DCC family here.  C is best for us personally, B is worst, A and D are in the middle.  But I don't want us DCC families to get stuck fighting against each other on which one is worst for our particular neighborhood, while the richer schools just get almost everything they want. These options are rigged.[/quote]

We’re also a DCC family and I agree completely about not fighting against each other.  That’s not the real issue and it’s not productive.

At the same time, some of these options significantly increase the FARMS rate at Einstein only. In the context of the planned “regions” nonsense, Einstein stands to lose a good deal of accelerated classes, potentially, and that’s really not okay.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics