Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is it safe to summarize as: - option D tries to address overcrowding (while causing the most split articulation) - option B tries to minimize split articulation (while ignoring some obvious proximity issues) Are options A and C the middle ground between those two forces? Or …? [/quote] I voted for options B and C because it has the least surprises for our neighborhood. Any split articulations makes sense geographically. All of the demographics in these options and messed up but I don’t think it’s the jobs of the school system to solve decades of societal problems. None of the options solve overcrowding at all DCC schools which is what they said the reopening of Woodward would solve. [b]Why are my taxpayers going to this if it doesn’t solve anything?[/b][/quote] Excellent question. MCPS has a long history of demanding more money for more space when they actually have enough space but don't want to use it efficiently.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
