Reply to FCPS Boundary Review

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "FCPS Boundary Review - New Maps"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]DP who posted to see more information.

I am not V and am very interested in finding out more --but I still want to know what the other recommendations were and who sat in the Region 5 group.  And, I would also like to see what the Region 1 recommendations were.  Why?  I find it very odd that Region 1 rep came back to FairFacts Matter and only reported on 1 priority from 1 group.

[/quote]

Fairfacts matters has representatives on BRAC. So there was no game of telephone, FFM heard it directly.[/quote]

That's not PP's point.  She is curious why, of all the priorities that the BRAC members from the different regions shared in the last meeting, the FairFACTS Matters representative on BRAC only flagged the Forestville recommendation from Region 5 that could impact the Langley boundary.  [/quote]

I was pointing out that PP’s central premise was wrong.

I fully support thru releasing all the priorities for all the regions. While I don’t know specifically what region 1’s priorities were, I know for a fact that they didn’t involve moving schools that are not in their region.[/quote]

I understand what you're saying, but the thrust of PP's comment wasn't about [i]how[/i] the Region 5 priority was communicated to/by FairFACTS Matters, but instead [i]why[/i] that was the only priority from any region that FairFACTS Matters highlighted.  [/quote]

Oh, that’s easy. They highlighted it because [b]it was so ridiculous and out of line[/b].[/quote]

Trust me, plenty of others feel that way about other recommendations so far.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics