Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Beyoncé’s husband Jay Z accused of raping 13 yo girl with Diddy"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I will never listen to any P Diddy, R Kelly, Chris Brown (abuser), Jay Z, Beyoncé, and other entertainers’ music associated with this horrible network ever again regardless of the legal outcome. Scooter Braun, who managed Justin Beiber, is such a scumbag. Drake is also despicable now. Toronto entitled Rosedale (richest neighbourhood in Toronto) predator.[/quote] I personally think it’s dumb to refuse to listen to music by a certain artist just because you don’t like them as a person. I think Michael Jackson was a pedophile but still love to listen to “Beat It.” No pun there right??[/quote] NP. People can do what they want, but it would be tough to stop listening to all the music associated with these artists. Just P Diddy alone; I don't think people realize how much R&B and rap music Diddy had his hands in. I'm hard-pressed to think of what top artists in those genres did not work with Diddy. I mean, Diddy co-wrote and produced with Aretha Franklin for one of her albums. And then all the artists that he signed under Bad Boy Records. Also, his umbrella company Combs Enterprises. Did you know that Diddy designed the Mavericks alternative jersey for two seasons? Good luck avoiding all things associated with Diddy and Combs Enterprises. [/quote] Agreed. It's unrealistic to stop listening or taking in everything and artist does because they're bad. [/quote] They're not artists.[/quote] This conversation's point has gone completely over your head. [/quote] Not at all. They're not "artists." They're into making tons of money through lyrics and behavior that show very little or no respect for women.[/quote] The conversation was about supporting these people by listening to their music or partaking in their products. What you call them (artist or not) is irrelevant. You could start a new thread to discuss what their label should be.[/quote] Technically, your conversation is irrelevant to the title of the thread.[/quote] Technically, your comment about whether they are artists is irrelevant to the title of the thread and the conversation you were commenting on. [/quote] They are abusers of women.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics