Reply to Debate Moderator Fact Checks

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Debate Moderator Fact Checks"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]It's hilarious to me that people are like why didn't they fact check Harris? If she had said that Haitians in Springfield Ohio were eating people's pets, she would've been fact checked as well. Trump was fact checked 5 times, and they were for his most egregious lies. He had 30 or so other lies that were not fact checked. He lied over 50 times during the Biden debate that went unchecked, so maybe the few checks he had on him did rein him in a little. [/quote]

DP.  The fact checks weren't equal, plain and simple.  She lied numerous times, but wasn't called out on it.  That was clearly by design from ABC.  The moderators were clearly prepared to fact check Trump.  They were not prepared to fact check Harris.

Harris couldn't even answer the moderators' questions.  Today's local Philadelphia ABC interview confirms that she can't.[/quote]

The moderators don't have a "fact check AI" sitting in front of them evaluating every sentence, then deciding what to fact-check a candidate on. The lies that Trump actually got fact-checked on were so over-the-top, the moderators had no choice. Executing babies after birth? Eating household pets? He got away with his numerous run-of-the-mill lies. Trump lost the debate due to his own (extremely evident) cognitive decline and general lack of knowledge.[/quote]

DP.  No, the moderators were wrong on their fact checks.  There's plenty of evidence that they were, with mainstream publications printing retractions.

[/quote]
How come you still won’t give a single example of this? We’re waiting.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics