Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bye-bye Chevron "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][img]https://i.imgur.com/584QRVw.jpeg[/img][/quote] This kind of nonsense demonstrates a complete ignorance of how the regulatory process works. NO, agencies cannot just invent new laws out of thin air, and there IS oversight and accountability. Every regulation cites the enabling / authorizing statute for the rulemaking and every rulemaking goes through public comment, review and approval before it goes into effect. Proposed rulemaking is submitted to both houses of Congress as well as the Government Accountability Office for review and approval or overturn. Congress has oversight hearings on rulemaking. Congress has the power to modify or repeal regulations. That's all under the Congressional Review Act. The Administrative Procedure Act also gives industry, academia, stakeholders and the public opportunity to review and provide comment on proposed rules as well. It is the height of dishonesty and ignorance that the Republicans have promoted this complete mythology of "unelected bureaucrats creating thin air with no oversight." That's always been a bald-faced lie. And now SCOTUS has seriously undermined the ability of Executive Branch agencies to function coherently along with burdening Congress and lower courts with all of this.[/quote] Then why are you so upset about judicial review? If ever you say is true then Chevron was meaningless. But you can’t simultaneously act like everything was always above board and that somehow getting rid of Chevron is a big deal. [/quote] What subject matter expertise does the court have in whatever the regulatory matter is? And how is a judicial review process happening in the course of a week or less adequately replace a process that previously took months of systematic review by subject matter experts, legal experts, policy experts, academia, industry and the public, along with rounds of review by both chambers of Congress and the GAO? Again, gross ignorance is showing. It's a dishonest power grab and nothing more.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics