Reply to If women could go back in time

Forum Index » Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)

Reply to "If women could go back in time"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]But what did that teach children’s about women’s capabilities? And how many women stayed with abusive or philandering men because they were entirely dependent on them?

Why is your question only posed to women? Do modern nen like having the option of being more involved in raising their children? Do children like spending time with both parents? [/quote]

What do you think you’re teaching your children with the constant messaging that a woman prioritizing taking care of her own kids is basically a useless loser?

Often it has nothing to do with capabilities, but priorities.  But sure, make sure Larla knows that you’d rather be working on yet another powerpoint about synergy than playing candyland with her.  You’re a modern woman and kids are just an accessory![/quote]

You sound like such a defensive SAHM. I think there are advantages to women and children if both parents work. I did not use the hyperbolic language you felt the need to employ.

You views are extremely sexist. Why is a woman required to prioritize child-rearing, but not a man? [/quote]

She is not REQUIRED to, you absolute doofus!  But if she CHOOSES to, there is NOTHING WRONG WITH IT!  She shouldn’t be shamed or ridiculed.  Acting as though a woman is less than for “just” being a mom is what is actually sexist.  The fact that you don’t get this means you’re either being deliberately obtuse, or you are thicker than a brick wall.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics