Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Money and Finances
Reply to "SVB failure "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Why not just give depositors the HTM assets? They can decide what to do. [/quote] Probably most of their assets are tied up in loans not in HTM treasuries [/quote] See page 18 of PDF. $130 B in cash, bank deposits and securities. $74 B in loans. Our of total assets of $212 B (all as of year end). On page 21 of the PDF, you can see their securities were almost entirely US Treasuries or securities issued by Fannie or Freddie. A small amount of munis ($6 billion) and much smaller amounts of corporate and foreign debt. Except for the interest rate risk and reliance on tech depositors, SVB is about as boring as a bank can get. https://www.ffiec.gov/npw/FinancialReport/ReturnFinancialReportPDF?rpt=FRY9C&id=1031449&dt=20221231 [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
