Reply to Jen Hatmaker

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Jen Hatmaker"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote] I live in TX. I know it’s community property. My point is exactly that. You split assets. Therefore she might need the CASH (liquidity) to buy him out of whatever his half of their Buda house is.

Plus, 50/50 isn’t always assured. It’s generally what happens - unless there’s a fight over assets - especially if one spouse stays home and takes care of kids while the other spouse is working. He could always argue for a greater split especially with her current earning potential v his. We also don’t do alimony but cases can be made for spousal support for x amount of time. [/quote]

He is going to have a tough time arguing for child support if none of his kids are speaking to him, and (at least on social media) changing their names to King. It may be safe to assume that they are not hanging out with him regularly, and therefore he should not be receiving child support.[/quote]

Um, that’s not how child support works  :roll: [/quote]

Well in fairness, to an extent it does. Its based on the number of nights the child spends with each parent. If the kids refuse to see him, there is nothing to support from a CS perspective. Could he get alimony if he isn't working? Yes. That would have no bearing on the kids feelings about him or refusal to see him. [/quote]

I am not attorney, but I would assume he could get alimony. I assume all those times she was on book tours of interviews or doing presentations, he was taking care of the kids. I assume just like many wives, he made many sacrifices to help her career. If a supportive wife gets alimony, why shouldn't he unless they had nannies, maids, cooks, etc.[/quote]

I'm not saying he shouldnt/ I was simply correcting the misinformation that CS is not related to the parent seeing the children. Its directly related to how much time he sees the kids. Depending on their assets, I would think that if he doesnt really have the kids much, his half of the estate would likely mean he was able to continue his standard of living. How long have they been married? [/quote]

Texas doesn’t have alimony.

They got married at like 21 so they definitely didn’t have a prenup.

If she petitions for full physical custody he will be on the hook for CS.

The business manager thing seems like a hindsight red flag. It makes sense since the speculation locally is of a kid from another woman. [/quote]

The courts will not give one parent 100% custody of the kids without a damn good reason.  If Brandon was a drug addict or sexually abused the kids, then that could be the reason, but other than that, it would be 50/50. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics