Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "new kavanaugh sexual assault allegations"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Damn. The NYT has updated the piece tonight to say that the earlier version omitted something from the book. That "something" was that the female student who was the alleged victim declined to be interviewed and friends say she does not recall the incident. [/quote] In other words, she doesn’t want her life to be ruined by relentless harpies like you people. I can’t blame her. [/quote] Really. Show us an example of a ruined life? All the liars thus far have lived their lives just fine. Making up things and coming forward hasn’t hurt anybody except the accused. That’s ok. The ruined lives along the way are all fine. Means justifies the end to the liberal mind. A mind that manages to lie itself in some weird loop. Liberalism is a mental disease devoid of logic and facts. This board shows that in spades. [/quote] Aside from the death threats and dragging her name through the mud that CBF endured, what could she possibly be afraid of? Amirite?[/quote] Lying is a terrible thing. Might want to read about why she constructed that door.[/quote] I really hope you don't have any daughters. If so, I feel sorry for them. You'll take the man's side of any story they come home with.[/quote] DP. TBH - her story was void of details, inconsistent in the few "details" she had (was it 3 or 4 people with her?), and her responses to some of the questions under oath were questionable - like the whole door story. She claims that she needed another way out of a building, but it seems it may have been a 2nd entrance for renting.... against zoning laws..... [quote]FEINSTEIN: “I see. And do you have that second front door?” FORD: “Yes.” FEINSTEIN: “It…” FORD: “It — it now is a place to host Google interns. Because we live near Google, so we get to have — other students can live there.” Now that she mentions it, the additional remodeling in effect added a self-contained unit to the house, with its own entrance, perfect for “hosting” or even possibly renting, in violation of the local zoning. Perhaps a professional office might be a perfect use, if an illegal one. And in the tight Palo Alto real estate market, there are a lot of games played for some serious income. And that may answer another strange anomaly. Because since 1993, and through some listings even today, there was another tenant at what is now the Ford property. It is listed as this person’s residence from 1993 to July 2007, a week or so after she sold the house to the Fords. Her name is Dr. Sylvia Randall, and she listed this address for her California licensed practice of psychotherapy, including couples psychotherapy, until her move to Oregon in 2007. Currently she only practices in that state, where she also pursues her new career as a talented artist as well. But many existing directories still have Dr. Randall’s address listed at what is now the Ford residence. Which raises other questions. Why has Christine Ford never said a word about Dr. Randall? And why has she been evasive about the transcripts of her crucial 2012 therapy session, which she can’t seem to recall much about either? Did she provide them to the Washington Post, or did she just provide the therapist’s summary? Who was the psychologist? In a phone call, I asked Dr. Randall if she had sold her house to the Fords. She asked back how I had found out. I asked if she was the couples therapist who treated the Fords. She would not answer yes or no, replying, “I am a couples therapist.” So was the second door an escape for Christine Blasey Ford’s terrors or was documenting her terrors a ruse for sneaking a rental unit through tough local zoning ordinances? And if the second door allowed access and egress for the tenant of a second housing unit, rather than for the primary resident, how did the door’s existence ameliorate Ford’s professed claustrophobia?[/quote] https://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2018/10/02/records_raise_questions_about_fords_double-door_story__138225.html [/quote] In other words, you would believe a guy over your own daughters. Nice.[/quote] 1. This is not my daughter. My daughter would not wait 30 years. 2. If my daughter was unable to present details (like the date, place, time) or even state that something actually happened and confidently identify the perpetrator, I would not make accusations against someone. 3. There is a reason her parents have said they supported the confirmation of Kavanaugh. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics