Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Entertainment and Pop Culture
Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Popculturechat is claiming this: "Baldoni/Lively Judge rules that Justin Baldoni's lawsuit against Blake Lively was "legally frivolous and factually baseless" and sanctions Baldoni's lawyers" Is that true?[/quote] https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304/gov.uscourts.nysd.634304.1270.0.pdf Basically yes it was true. The judge ruled that most of the claims that were against Reynolds were legally frivalous and factually baseless and that he shouldn't have been included and he also ruled that adding that there is a claim for relief for by Sarowitz, Nathan, Abel or IEWUM was also legally frivolous and factually baseless. Of the 7 claims, the judge ruled 6 of them were legally frivolous and factually baseless. One of them he agreed was legitimate. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
