Reply to Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Lively/Baldoni Lawsuit Part 2"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Looks like the checks to the Blake boy stopped.[/quote]

Blake bot[/quote]

I'm just sitting here amused at how everything is filtered as the best day ever for Baldoni. The judge pretty much said they lied to the court when they sued Sloane. [/quote]

The Blake/Jones/ Sloane side lost every one of their motions.  But sure, that’s a bad day for Baldoni.[/quote]

That simply is not the case. Most of the decisions were mixed. I read the decisions before reddit and was shocked how all the reddit headlines spun this as Baldoni winning everything.

The judge sanctioned Wayfarer for for filing frivolous claims, almost all of them except the one against Ryan Reynolds, which reddit spins as "Judge rules the claim against Reynolds was totally valid, Baldoni won!!!" (But it wasn't valid, it was dismissed; the judge is just saying it didn't meet the high bar of being completely frivolous).

The judge thoroughly explained how Wayfarer lied to the court in filing claims against Sloane (I thought Baldoni fans thought this was a terrible thing when Vanzan did it?), but she didn't file the right technical motion. He denied her motion without prejudice. She just needs to file a different type of motion to get her attorney's fees. I'm sure she will, and will probably win.

Some of Jones' claims were dismissed and some weren't.

The only total loss was Jones' motion to amend her complaint, and that was more due to bad lawyering and the statute of limitations. In fact the basis of the decision was Jones had enough information of Nathan's culpability that she should have sued her for defamation from the onset. (I actually think Jones should appeal because she clearly did request any information about media contacts which would include the Business Insider article, but whatever).[/quote]

Thank you. I thought I was either going crazy or couldn't read. I only read the Rule 11 decision but it's a clear win for Lively, I couldn't figure out why everyone kept calling it a win for Baldoni. The judge was extremely critical of the Baldoni/Wayfarer attorneys.

It's hard to tell if people pushing the narrative that Baldoni had a good day in court yesterday are PR plants or people who have bought a PR campaign to convince them of that. Either way, it's totally made up. So weird.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics