Reply to Fairfax County Double Murder

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Fairfax County Double Murder"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Just a reminder what was posted pg 142 from someone who attended the bond hearing:

AP had a bond hearing on Tuesday.
Here is what happened.

Defense and Prosecutor entered several pieces of evidence. Including:
- A copy of the chats between CB and JR was entered under seal
- Multiple pictures of the scene were entered, many under seal.

Defense's Argument

- Prosecutor previously "misstated" that AP had bought plane tickets using her passport.
- She actually had used to apply for a work visa and student visa. AP was legally in the country at the time of her arrest with no intention of leaving.
- Prosecutor has not provided any actual evidence of a conspiracy. Just public statements.
- AP was actively dating multiple people, did not deny relationship with BB during police interview, but mentioned she was dating several people.
- Prosecutor overstated extent of JR's incapacitation from first shot. The Medical Examiner stated that there was possibility that JR could see and move.

Prosecutor's Argument

- Prosecutor surprised Defense with a document showing that ICE has asked to be notified if she is release from custody, and they have a warrant for her. He is afraid that if she is released and ends up in federal custody, they will deport her.
- Prosecutor stated that there is no extradition treaty with Brazil, and that the Feds do not have to acknowledge the case's priority. Feds could just deport AP and then the state of VA has no control.
- Prosecutor also argued that she is manipulative and can be manipulated, and therefore still a danger.
- Displayed a picture of JR's body. JR was clutching his stomach on his back
- Mainly re-iterated things said previously at preliminary hearing.
- Mentioned that BB took the 5th on every question during prelim.

Other facts that came out (from chat transcripts and other things referred to by both sides)

- CB and JR communicated using Fetlife and Telegram.
- JR brought up the idea of bringing a knife, CB asked about the details.
- They discussed blood play (cutting)
- CB asked JR, "Do you still want to tear off my clothes? I have a set of old pajamas you can tear"
- A set of ripped pajamas was recovered from the scene
- Pics of a knife, ropes, chains, rubber restraints were sent by JR to CB
- CB took selfie in a bathing suit and sent to husband. A few hours later sent the same selfie to JR with caption: "I sent this to my husband and he didn't even notice I lost 20 pounds"
- Judge questioned about the 45 min phone call over telegram that occurred between CB and JR
- After the phone call, JR texted: "It was great hearing your sexy voice"
- JR wrote that he had only done blood play once before, with razor blades
- CB had several superficial cuts that barely broke the skin
- JR was in the process of cutting CB with BB walked in
- CB wrote "trip to the zoo" on calendar
- CB had multiple lacerations to her neck and carotid artery. Three lacerations to the right side of her neck were the most likely the cause of death
- In the second 911 call, (mentioned but not played) BB is trying to save CB's life by applying pressure

Judge's Decision
Denied bond for two reasons.
- First, that FCPD could lose jurisdiction/control if the Feds take custody and/or deport
- Second, that AP could still pose a risk to community.[/quote]
You got a few things wrong to say the least. The police believe that Christine's profile was not of her own creation or even knowledge. It was created by brendan. Another thing you got wrong is whom ever Joe was speaking with and it appears now it was brendan using a voice app to change his voice asked Joe to get a knife, and brought up blood play. That was NOT Joe at all. They then asked after he had it would he take a photo of it and send it. They were setting this entire thing up to make him take the fall. In court the prosecutor and the coroner did NOT over state Joe's condition and capacity after the first shot. Both shots were progressive death shots which means either or both killed him, this was explained in the hearing by the sworn coroner. It was always stated by Juliana that she shot Joe from eight or ten feet away as he laid on the floor. He was not up and moving, he was not killing Christine, as Christine as likely all ready stabbed by Brendan before Joe ever arrived at the house. Your story is just that a story and not the facts of the case. They are not the facts of what laid out in court, you are misleading people on the forum and you are very confused or your purposes are nefarious. It is clear however to most that hear the actual facts of this case that Brendan executed a plan plan to lure Joe Ryan in, to use him as a fall guy for the murder of his wife Christine, and than to kill Joe to secure an alibi. Juliana had a part, she is guilty also of murdering Joe, and aiding Branden in the murder of his own wife, and covering up. Let's all remember what Brendan's job was. He is law enforcement for the IRS and understood computer forensics and how to commit a murder. When the trial happens for Juliana I hope more comes out and that law enforcement finally have enough information to make the crime stick. I would not want to live in his neighborhood either. He is clearly a danger, but the prosecution must make it stick that he killed his wife and also framed Joe. This will take a boat load of evidence and ideally Juliana will figure out her lover used her also as a means to an end. I am confident that one day Christine and Joe will have justice for their murders. [/quote]
Sweetheart, facts are facts. That's what came out of the bond hearing. You are making thing sup.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics