Reply to Boundary Review Meetings

Forum Index » Fairfax County Public Schools (FCPS)

Reply to "Boundary Review Meetings"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]That 27-28 change will also include removing AAP Centers at the middle school level and instead having AAP at all middle schools. Someone finally realized all these projects need to be combined into one comprehensive effort.[/quote]

I think they are going ahead with it.

Looks like they are bowing to Great Falls on Western school.  Very sad.[/quote]

With the cancellation of next week’s programming vote, you might be right [/quote]

What is going on with GF and the new HS?[/quote]

There have long been people in Great Falls who've tried to throw roadblocks in the way of a new, traditional HS in western Fairfax, but it's unlikely that has much to do with the recent delays in moving forward with a decision about the programming for the western HS or the boundaries for the new school.  They've got to work through permitting and construction issues before a new public HS could open, even with only 9th and 10th graders, and the biggest complainers about the potential boundaries for the new school have been people now at Oakton, not people in GF.[/quote]

They could open as is with 9 and 10.  The school was built to hold that many kids and they can certainly adapt.  Just look what they do at the overcrowded schools.

Great Falls thinks these kids are insurance for them.  That has been clear ever since the purchase.[/quote]

i think the problem with opening is they didn’t file the right  permitting (2232?). besides a few vocal great falls residents on next door the rest of the town does not have an opinion either way on the western high school. it does not affect us. [/quote]
+1. So sad that there is one poster here who posts negative posts about great falls at least a dozen times a day, even when it is not relevant.

I think she dated someone from Great falls and got dumped.[/quote]

No other group actively organized against this school.  But, you know that.[/quote]

You mean that non-great falls group that wanted it to be a magnet? That’s literally the only one I know that organized anything. Others just questioned the lack of plan and cost.

But you know that.[/quote]

And, you know who was the base of FairFacts.  They wanted to stop the school.  Period.  A magnet is not the same as a school with boundaries.

But, hopefully, this is not over.[/quote]

Nope.

Fairfacts wanted to stop countywide rezoning.

That is why they formed.[/quote]

Like 3/4 of the FairFACTS Matters facebook posts are the same guy posting exaggerated numbers and crazy reasons the school couldn't possibly open, and that the county should "sell it back."  He's deranged, and their mods do nothing about it.[/quote]
Ok, so you’re just straight up misleading people here.  The fairfacts matters Facebook group is open to all posters, it’s an OPEN forum where people typically have a variety of views, so you arguing that fairfacts has taken a position because of some guy’s post is just super misleading because the group has taken no position on the school. It would be like saying DCUM hates great falls because jeff allows the deranged anti-great falls lady to post frequently here.

Maybe you are just misinformed, but people have told you that the group has taken no stance on western before and you continue to push false statements.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics