Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This has NOTHING to do with abortion and 100% to do with the privacy rights that ARE guaranteed by our constitution. Women want to give birth at home. Homebirths can be banned. It's not in the constitution, right? Women want to have large families. Large families can be banned. It's not in the constitution, right? Women want to then homeschool their children. Homeschooling can be banned. It's not in the constitution, right? Women have PRIVACY rights, the rights to decide when and how they want to have their children and raise their children. Make no mistake. This is an attack on ALL women -- women who are pro abortion, women who are anti choice. It really makes NO difference. If you are in favor of women having children and having families and raising those families the way that you think that they should be raised, then be VERY scared of this opinion. It is taking away YOUR rights too. It has NOTHING to do with abortion at all. It states specifically that women have NO fundament rights at all unless they are specifically guaranteed by the constitution.[/quote] There are no privacy rights in the Constitution. That is the whole issue. They can be added. People should go for it. I even think an act of Congress could preserve abortion rights. But they otherwise do not exist. Should intentional homebirths be banned -- yes I think they should -- no issue. The other rights are protected by a combination of portions of the Constitution. [/quote] What???? I hope you are 100% joking. Women have been giving birth at home for thousands and thousands of years. EVERY single president was born at home until Jimmy Carter (and maybe after, too). Women do NOT need to be subjected to male notions and control on how and when to give birth. That is the next step though and this reasoning is why I am so concerned. Fine, they outlaw abortion. Maybe half the country cares. But next they outlaw homebirth. Then they outlaw homeschooling. Then they outlaw more than one child. Then they outlaw natural birth. Get OUT Of my life, my family, and my decisions. I can birth on a boat, in a hot tub, or a rug. You do not have the right to tell me how I can push things out of my body. If it was a man needing to take a dump, you wouldn't tell him where and how to do it. I am not under your control. And, privacy rights do exist in the constitution. That is the basis of the Loving decision.[/quote] Can't believe you're comparing having a baby to taking a dump.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics