Reply to Jews and Germans

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Jews and Germans"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]
I'm second-guessing the PP, but a difference between the Holocaust and acts of genocide seems that the Holocaust's explicit objective was to kill and eradicate all Jews (and gypsies and homesexuals etc.) the Nazi slayers could get hold of. Stalin mass-murdered, but mainly as a means for preserving political power. The Japanese murdered, but mainly as a means to enforce military occupation. Slave traders murdered, but mostly as a means for providing the Americas with cheap labor. The US army murdered Native Americans, but mostly as a means to occupy their land.

In case of the Holocaust, mass-murder was not a means but an end in itself.

This doesn't at all lessen the suffering of other victims of genocide, but implies that in this aspect, the Holcoaust is unique.

[/quote]
All mass murder can be called a 'not a means but an end in itself'
all atrocities are different in some way and therefore unique
I would not discount someones suffering based on that, or call someone elses suffering more superior. Interesting how some subjects are still taboo. Like the slave trade, Brittish concentration camps, gulag (somewhat discussed, not a lot), atomic bomb[/quote]

Follow up: how is the slave trade or the atomic bomb a "taboo"? [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics