Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
College and University Discussion
Reply to "Over 280 University of California STEM faculty members have signed an open letter calling on the UC Board of Regents to "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The SAT is such an overrated measure, as in, the expectation that every school have like a 1500+ average SAT. Here's some historical averages from 2012 of various schools: Amherst College 1320-1530 California Institute of Technology 1460-1590 Columbia University, Columbia College 1400-1570 Dartmouth College 1350-1560 Georgetown University 1290-1490 Harvard University 1390-1590 Johns Hopkins University 1310-1510 Massachusetts Institute of Technology 1410-1570 Stanford University 1360-1550 University of California, Berkeley 1250-1510 University of California, Los Angeles 1170-1430 Williams College. 1310-1530 [/quote] The SAT was scored harder then. I’m not sure where your 1600 scale scores are from but it wasn’t a proportional concordance. A 2300 SAT then is a 1560 now , a 2160 was the start of 1500, and a 1980 was the start of a 1400. Most elite schools had test quartiles from 20XX-23XX, and medians of late 21XX to mid 22XX (corresponding to 1500-1530 today). So not much has changed. The test was even harder before that when it used to be on the 1600 scale. A 1350 was competitive for every top school. [/quote] This is their data source: https://eduplan.us/reality-check-sat-range-25th-75th-percentile-for-enrolled-students-at-various-selective-universities-and-colleges-nationwide/ A 1500 is closer to a 2230-2280 according to the various concordance tables online. Nonetheless, the obvious here is that the SAT scores are MUCH smaller than they are now. For some of these schools, you're essentially suggesting a 200 point gap in the difficulty between tests, which is...well not justifiable.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics