Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Option H is permanent and the old Wootton HS campus will be closed for good?"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I’m a future Wootton parent and I want Crown. If we lose option H, I’m not sending my kids into that moldy building! [/quote] So send them to private. You are in a very very small minority that wants crown. [/quote] We are fortunate to have the option of private school if it comes to that, but I’m speaking up because I know others who share my view and want Wootton at Crown as well. Many of us simply aren’t as vocal. The opposition may be loud, but it’s largely concentrated in one neighborhood. Not hearing from us doesn’t mean we don’t exist or that our numbers are small.[/quote] Then why aren’t being vocal about what you want? Don’t complain if/when you don’t get crown when you are doing nothing to advocate for it. [/quote] Why do they need to be. Crown makes sense. [/quote] haha ok. When homeless folks take over an abandoned Wootton and needles start being left all over the street for kids to find we will see if you still feel like it makes sense. [/quote] Are there druggie squatters at Radnor, or are you constructing a boogeyman?[/quote] An abandoned building attracts squatters no matter where it is. The building that was left empty right near wootton had that very problem. [/quote] And would Wootton sit empty, or would it be an occupied holding school for the predictable future?[/quote] Damascus is the only one on CIP and will not be renovated until 2029. So at least 2027-2029 will be empty and then on and off depends if they have money to renovate. [/quote] From the CIP working session where they introduced the ideas of having Crown be a holding school and the same for SSIMS/SCES https://go.boarddocs.com/mabe/mcpsmd/Board.nsf/files/DN4KQG52F8D6/$file/FY2027%20Cap%20Bdgt%20FY2027-2032%20CIP%20251104%20PPT.pdf Damascus would start occupancy in [i]FY[/i]29, which would be the fall of 2028. Between the summers of 2026 & 2027 and the 2027-28 school year, when Wootton would occupy Crown, there would be plenty of time to have the minimum required repair/upgrade work done to the old Wootton to make it more suitable for holding others. Crashing the schedule for that (to try to shoehorn it in over just the next 2 summers) only would be necessary if they likewise crashed the planning schedule for Damascus, advancing that whole effort by a year. After Damascus spends its three years there, Magruder would be next up, occupying the site for the next two. Wootton, next on the list in that presentation, would not need that project anymore, having moved to the Crown site. Not only do they accelerate things for the first two schools (as they would using Crown), with the noted savings, but also: -- Whichever school would be up for reno/replacement after Wootton (and there's a long list) would get there two years earlier, -- MCPS would save the difference between whatever the cost might be for that minimal old Wootton facility reconditioning and the $297.6M it was projected to cost for the Wootton revitalization/replacement (if using Crown as a holding school), -- Crown, scheduled for completion to be ready for occupancy for the 2027-28 school year, itself would see immediate occupancy (by Wootton plus whatever was added from Gaithersburg) instead of not only lying in a vacant state for a year, but also being one in which there, presumably, would not be construction activity scheduled at that that might dissuade the misuse of the property by third parties that was the concern of the past poster about a vacant Wootton, and, of course, -- Wootton would be in a new facility for the duration of all of that, instead of waiting for six more years before temporarily moving to Crown for holding and another two before they could move back. On the other hand: -- It would be in another location, a bit farther for most currently zoned to Wootton, -- The Wootton zone will change to incorporate parts of Gaithersburg, and may see one or other current elementary be assigned to neighboring secondary schools, -- The immediate neighborhood would have other communities rotating through the facility for school purposes, which is less than ideal (though the community use of the facility likely would be preserved, with both the old and new Wootton sites available in close proximity, whereas that community's use of the Crown facility would be far less likely if it was not their assigned school site).[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics