Reply to Third round options on Woodward Boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Third round options on Woodward Boundary study"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]If SSIMs is closed (and or Crown becomes Wootton), I expect some lawsuits.  Honestly, the options they present are arbitrary and capricious right now. [b]They are like "here's a map. We won't provide our reasoning for the map with written education based analysis of the criteria and economic/tax based justifications[/b]." Let's see how Taylor and his inept GC paper over this (Mahmoud v Taylor didn't turn out so well).  Also, Flo Analytics -- watch out.

They can't go with the original Options 1-4 (especially option 3); and they can't go with Options E, F or G.

See Crofton Families Fighting School Redistricting With Help Of Law Firm
https://patch.com/maryland/annearundel/crofton-families-fighting-school-redistricting-help-law-firm[/quote]

That's supposed to come later, in the superintendent's recommendation. Past supers' recommendations have been lengthy documents explaining their thinking about the options under consideration and a rationale for choosing the one they're recommending. We'll have to see if Taylor follows that template.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics