Reply to Second round options for Woodward boundary study

Forum Index » Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)

Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Is it safe to summarize as:
- option D tries to address overcrowding (while causing the most split articulation)
- option B tries to minimize split articulation
(while ignoring some obvious proximity issues)

Are options A and C the middle ground between those two forces? Or …? [/quote]

I like option A.[/quote]
Yes and if it’s right they made an error in # of seats at Northwood could move some from Kennedy to Northwood and solve Kennedy over-utilization, thereby addressing the one downside to Option A. Plus that option has the [b]fewest split articulations[/b].[/quote]

Thats the reason I like it.

I don't think it's an error in Northwood numbers. Numbes are correct becasue capacity was scaled down.

Take Option A:

Move entire GP to Woodward 
Move Entire Viers Mills ES + south of Viers Mills Rd from Wheaton to WJ to create space from Kenneddy to Wheaton.

[/quote]

Entire GP going to Woodward avoid split articualtion for GP
Entire Viers Mill going to WJ avoids split articualtion for VM

I like this idea. Whenver possible we should try to avoid split articulations.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics