Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "Second round options for Woodward boundary study "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]They freaking contorted themselves to come up with four sets of options that all keep Whitman, BCC, and WJ families happy. Nevermind the utilization issues, split articulation, or anything else. It's really messed up. [/quote] Current WJ families staying in WJ wil be happy with all these options, but not if they are in Woodward. Both will be vastly different school.[/quote] Woodward will be another BCC basically. If that's not good enough for WJ parents, cry me a river. They can't possibly have expected relief from overcrowding without any demographic change/with Woodward being filled 100% by WJ kids. They got as close as can possibly be expected with these options.[/quote] Earlier BCC, WJ was in the same range. Woodward will be worse than BCC with 30% + FARMS. BCC has 22% and WJ will be closer to Whitman with 15%. Woodward will be another RM without IB magnet.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
