Reply to Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Supreme Court to hear case on opting out of lessons with LGBTQ+ books"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Parents in Montgomery Count, Maryland, want to be able to opt out of instruction on gender and sexuality that they say goes against their religious convictions.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2025/01/17/lgbtq-books-supreme-court-montgomery-maryland-schools-religion/[/quote]

Why can't these a$$holes just go to parochial school? You cannot dictate public education according to religion. Nor should you. [/quote]
It's you who should form your own private schools where you can peddle your fetish-driven religion to the children of fellow groomers like yourself. The normal people in society shouldn't be driven out of schools so you can run amok with your incessant sex talks.[/quote]

+1000
It will never cease to astound me how much these people actually WANT to expose children to sexual topics.  Why?  I can't fathom the mind of someone who would promote this stuff to children.  [/quote]

What is with all your pearl clutching.  People are sexual entities.  They grow into that sexuality as the mature.  No one is promoting anything sexual or religious wise to kids in school.  They are just not shying away from letting kids make informed decisions. Sex exist.  It exist in many forms besides the missionary position.  Sexual health and responsibility exist.  Folks should understand it just like they get taught about other health.  LGBTQ people exist.  Folks should be taught to respect their choices just like you expect people to respect yours.

How is any of this difficult to comprehend? Why is any of it controversial? Half the people claiming to reject it on religious reasons have many more other things in their lives which are counter to religion observance and behavior.[/quote]

This isn’t just a sex ed class. These readings are embedded throughout the curriculum so parents have fewer options to withdraw their children. Pride Puppy for example was being utilized in an English class.

The lesson plans go well beyond “gays exist” as has been pointed out. It includes the idea that biological sex is a “guess” which is a pseudo religious, non falsifiable concept that doesn’t belong in a school.[/quote]

Again show us where this went much further?  Pride Puppy is an A to Z kid’s book.  Just because  one of the searches in the appendix of the book  is search for leather for L you all made it more than it is.  Leather is a type of material.  If kid was reading a Scottish book and we told them to look for Tartan or Kilt how would that be any different?[/quote]

Come on. In the context of pride parades, leather is not only a type of material. It is fetish and bondage wear at Pride. Nobody is using tartan as a tool of sexual gratification in Scottish kids books because that is not the primary use of tartan.

Please stop the idiocy. It is not working. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics