Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "SecDef shares US war Plan in Group chat"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Can someone smarter than me explain why Signal, which uses AES-256 encryption protocol, is less secure than government TS systems, which also use AES-256? Just asking as a non-tech person.[/quote] I can’t speak to the security, but using Signal gets around a potential FOIA. [/quote] That is one part. Also, every single person involved in this has a secure, encrypted phone for classified use only. There are approved communication protocols and signal is not one of them. They use it so that they can delete the messages that are supposed to be permanent[/quote] And these are all things that MAGA voters don’t understand about how professional feds are and how many rules they have to follow. If they understood any of this, they would be less easily manipulated into thinking a bunch of immature reckless yahoos should do these jobs. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
