Reply to If you could know the truth about any unsolved mystery, which would it be?

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "If you could know the truth about any unsolved mystery, which would it be?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Were the Menendez brothers legitimately molested by their Father or did they just use the “abuse excuse” to try to avoid prison time??

OF COURSE THEY WERE MOLESTED.

If not - they did a pretty decent acting performance during their first trial.

Their recent claims that the main reason the killed their parents was because they were afraid their Father was going to murder them so they killed their parents as a form of self~defense.

But they were both adults - if they truly feared for their lives they could have just left home.
YOU DON'T UNDERSTAND THE DYNAMICS OF ABUSE.

And why did they feel the need to spend so. much. money so soon after being forced to shoot their parents in self-defense?

IT WAS THE LATE 80S IN BEVERLY HILLS. THIS WAS THE CULTURE. EVERYONE WAS SPENDING LIKE THIS.

When if the letter to the cousin re: being molested was intentionally written 9 mos. prior to the murders as part of the murder plan?
When if they had planned the murders ahead of time then waited the nine mos. so the letter could not be used as a motive for the murder in its initial stage??

OCCUM'S RAZOR. YOU THINK THEY PLANNED THIS FOR 9 MONTHS? NO WAY.

Why did Erik confess to murdering his folks to his therapist yet made no mention of being molested?
I mean, if you feel comfortable confessing something as huge as murdering your own parents to a therapist then you should also feel 💯% comfortable discussing sexual abuse.

NO.

I am the same age as the brothers are now (55) and I disagree with the fact that sexual molestation was super taboo during 1989.
While it wasn’t discussed as much as it is these days - it certainly wasn’t taboo.

I'M 54. IT WAS VERY MUCH TABOO, ESPECIALLY FOR MEN.

I would love to know the mystery of if any incest actually took place prior to the murders….[/quote][/quote]

Still, they were 18 and 21 when they shot their parents. They could have easily rented a place together, so whatever happened in the house doesn't excuse the horrible crime. Remember they also threatened to kill their shrink. These two should never be released.[/quote]
+1 And if you believe they were abused and they’re justified for killing their father, [b]it’s not an excuse for killing their mother.[/b][/quote]

A mother who allows this to happen to her children deserves it even more than the one who committed the abuse. The abuser is clearly sick. The mother? She allowed it because it was easier for her. Hotter place in hell for her. Plenty of reason, let alone excuse, to kill her. [/quote]

I’m sorry but this sort of anti woman BS makes my blood boil. So a father repeatedly r*pes his son, and the mother is too scared to stop it, and the MOTHER deserves MORE blame than… the r*pist? What?? [/quote]

What? This is an anti-woman at all. You cannot bring children into this world and then fail to protect them to that degree. Full stop.[/quote]

But the father also brought them into this world and actively raped and tortured them. And yet the mother , according to PP, deserves MORE blame than the father despite the father being the actual rapist. [b]Tell me how this is not anti woman. [/b][/quote]

Ok:

If a mother is the parent who is horribly abusing her children (which is not the case with the Menendez brothers, but, sadly, is often the case), and the father is aware of it and does nothing -- then that father deserves the hottest circle of hell. If you are the (relatively) capable parent, you get your child out of there, you protect your child at all costs instead of allowing the abuse to happen. You do whatever you have to do instead of allowing it to go on for years, and years, and years, destroying the psyche of your child(ren). [/quote]

I just think it’s absolutely wild that you’d hold the non raping parent to a higher level of punishment than the actual rapist parent,[b] letting the rapist off the hook because they are “disturbed”.[/b] As if a parent who knows the other parent is abusing their child in this way and can’t bring themselves to stop it isn’t also absolutely mentally disturbed and traumatized. [b]Why let the rapist use this excuse of being unwell but not the other parent? [/b]

Glad you aren’t a judge, over there letting the rapists and murderers off and sending their family members to jail instead. [/quote]

You have incredibly poor reading comprehension. No one anything about "letting" a "rapist use this excuse" or about "letting the rapist off the hook." In fact there were no excuses made here and no one got "off the hook" -- they both got shot.

And what makes you think I'm not a judge?[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics