Reply to Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "Scott Peterson Netflix Documentary "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous]Upon his arrival at the Peterson home, Detective Brocchini met with Jon Evers and Byron Duerfeldt, first responding Officers to the missing persons call.  Officer Spurlock was also there, and may have been the source of Brocchini's initial suspicion of Scott.  As the officer in charge, Evers had just learned that, when questioned by Spurlock on what he'd been fishing for in the Bay, Scott couldn't say what he had been fishing for.  This statement, repeated in whispers to Brocchini even before he'd met Scott, was the start of the spin and twist of Scott's words and actions to fit Brocchini's coming theory that Peterson was guilty of murder.  Scott's qualifying statement that his real intention was 'just to get the boat in the water' was given no credence, although it made sense.

What were the other things found that pointed to guilt in Brocchini's mind?  The list isn't long and can be shown to prove that Scott told the truth that first night.

1.He didn't know what he was fishing for or what kind of bait he was using. 
2.He said he went fishing instead of golfing because it was too cold to golf.
3.There were two mops in a bucket on the porch.
4.Laci's purse was in the closet of the couple's bedroom. 
5.Two duffel bags were disturbed in the spare bedroom.
6.Dirty cleaning rags were piled on top of the washer.
7.A disarrayed throw rug lay against the door.

This is what they found the first night, and from these observations, a case for first degree murder was instigated.
[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics