Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Metropolitan DC Local Politics
Reply to "MOCO - County Wide Upzoning, Everywhere"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][b]Can someone explain what upzoning will accomplish? [/b] I just want someone to lay it all out, in detail, so we can all come back later and point out how it didn't do *any* of the things we were promised. [/quote] Allow property owners to build two-unit, three-unit, or four-unit residential buildings, by right, in addition to one-unit residential buildings, in certain areas of Montgomery County where currently only one-unit residential buildings may be built by right.[/quote] There you go again focusing on process instead of outcomes. One reason YIMBYism has failed to deliver housing affordability is that YIMBYs are too focused on rules and plan approvals instead of actual housing production. The YIMBY approach is especially ineffective and harmful in the Montgomery County market where we have a lot of approved plans but not enough construction. There are other drivers of the county’s poor housing growth that are much more important than land use regulation. The first is that developers view MoCo as a riskier submarket than DC or Fairfax because job growth in the county is so weak. Not only can developers reliably make more money in Fairfax and DC now, but a building boom in either of those places (or Loudoun or Prince William) would gut the MoCo market. The other reason is that it’s cost prohibitive to add SFH (attached or detached) on the little land where adding SFH is actually allowed because the YIMBYs have put in place punitive fees in those areas. Sure, a lot of land only allows SFH, but there’s already SFH in those places, so if one gets torn down and rebuilt, you’re not adding any SFH. Prices for SFH have risen faster than for any other housing type, which sends a clear signal about what customers demand. Adding SFH would relieve upward price pressure across the housing market but YIMBYs can’t bring themselves to support SFH construction. YIMBYs like to claim the pro-growth high ground, but if you look at their track record in MoCo they’ve produced anti-growth outcomes. The only thing that’s grown is developers’ profits. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics