Reply to We need massively stepped up criminal enforcement and convictions in DC

Forum Index » Metropolitan DC Local Politics

Reply to "We need massively stepped up criminal enforcement and convictions in DC"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I smell a rat.  What I see from those numbers is that 44% of MPD just stopped doing their jobs because they are butthurt over "defund the police" talk that only amounted to 2.8%.   Those cops are in violation of their oath of duty and are fraudulently collecting checks from DC taxpayers.  [/quote]

Two police officers were recently convicted of murder because they pursued a criminal who fled from them, and the criminal recklessly drove into a car. People are really wondering why police are more reticent to enforce things these days? There’s a high likelihood a violent criminal will do something stupid and the city will ruin your life in response.[/quote]

DC police know very well what happened to 6 Baltimore city officers:

- Baltimore prosecuted the officers for doing their jobs (and that prosecutor is now herself a convicted criminal).

DC has made it abundantly clear it is seeking to prosecute police officers.

Why would any reasonable police officer risk his or her salary by doing their job, when DC seems to prosecute officers for doing their job and arresting criminals?

The current situation is not difficult to understand.[/quote]

Were these the Baltimore cops who killed a guy by slamming him around in the back of a van?

. . . [/quote]

That is a lie.  The 6 officers were criminally indicted, put on trial, found innocent, and fully exonerated.

Then the officers went a step further:  they sued the city for malicious and false prosecution:  AND THEY WON.

You are lying PP.

What you claim did not happen, as a matter of fact, and as a matter of law.[/quote]

Yes, they won their suit.  But that doesn't somehow make Freddie Gray any less dead, doesn't make the severe spinal injury that he didn't have prior to arrest somehow magically go away.  [/quote]

Not the PP, but I don't understand your point. What point are you making?[/quote]

The point is that the PP was trying to claim the whole Freddie Gray thing was somehow a lie.   The problem with that is that Baltimore Police arrested a guy and he ended up dead from a severe spine injury to his neck while in their custody.  Even though they won their suit they were still responsible. If you still don't get it then you probably aren't remotely qualified to even be here having this conversation.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics