Reply to Prince Harry’s book

Forum Index » The DCUM Book Club

Reply to "Prince Harry’s book"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]This NYT op ed gets to the gist of Harry's message.

https://www.nytimes.com/2023/01/25/opinion/harry-meghan-tabloids.html[/quote]

Very well written ! I wonder what public opinion about Harry and Meghan will be like 20 years from now.[/quote]

It was written by a woman whose organization receives funding from Archewell, FYI. [/quote]

And? Are you familiar with Tuferki's writing?  Are questioning her ethics or judgment here?  What, in the article, do you disagree with?[/quote]

She cannot present an objective opinion on this matter if she’s getting paid by Meghan and Harry. I do question her ethics and judgement. She should have disclosed her financial ties to Archewell.

[/quote]

I’ll assume the NYT has rules about disclosure and will issue a correction if needed. I agree that such funding should be disclosed.

One of Harry’s main complaints is that the royal family/staff place stories while denying that they comment right? I’m inclined to agree. The rules the tabloids and the royals use seem wildly different from the rules that newspapers in DC use with government officials, for example. I think the coded phrasing in our newspapers is confusing and unnecessary but you can usually get a sense of approximately who is talking and whether it was sanctioned by their boss. The royals/palace seems to be totally dishonest about what they’re doing. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics