Reply to Should Biden even continue as POTUS?

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Should Biden even continue as POTUS?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Both parties consist of braindead hypocrites.

Democrats wanted Trump held liable for possessing classified documents, but now that Biden has been caught doing the same, it’s SO different.

Republicans claimed Trump’s possession of classified docs was NBD, but it’s a huge deal now that Biden’s been doing it too.

Not a single scruple or moral to be found among both parties. [/quote]

Sorry your take doesn't even pass a smell test.  Trump has some explaining to do.  Biden is a open and close case.  [/quote]

You guys are dense AF. Possession is not the crime. The proof so far is that Trump lied about having any documents, obstructed attempts to search for documents, then said the classified documents belong to him personally, and that Biden’s staff packed up his office and mistakenly kept some classified briefing documents. Anything beyond that is conjecture or wishful thinking. [/quote]

This is incorrect. Mishandling classified IS a crime. Go store classified in your garage and see what happens.  [/quote]

Knowingly, intent, etc. Stop repeating nonsense. [/quote]

Whoever, being an officer, employee, contractor, or consultant of the United States, and, by virtue of his office, employment, position, or contract, becomes possessed of documents or materials containing classified information of the United States, [b]knowingly removes[/b] such documents or materials without authority and [b]with the intent[/b] to retain such documents or materials at an unauthorized location shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for not more than five years, or both.

Knowingly -- there were TOP SECRET STAMP on each document, Biden will have a hard time to prove that he had no knowledge.
Intent - Documents stayed there for years. If he removed them to prepare for briefing and returned them the very next day, that would be a different story and no one would imply intent from that situation. Holding the documents for several years in an unauthorized location is a crime. [/quote]

Not a lawyer here, but this sounds logical.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics