Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Off-Topic
Reply to "Child killed by Neighborhood Watch captain while walking home"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote]Every person who has actually WRITTEN the law is coming out against their so-called "interpretation." [/quote] You mean some hill-jack, crypto-fascist gun-loving redneck state representative from Florida wrote a law defending the rights of gun owners, and didn't understand its full implications? Well, pardon me if I don't fall out of my chair in surprise. It seems like there are several important issues here. First, the law states that the defense isn't available if the person claiming it acted illegally. So, was Zimmerman acting illegally? (The failure to follow the instructions of the 911 operator, accordign to law enforcement sources, is not illegal.) Is following someone ilegal? Is accosting him and/or chasing he when he runs away illegal, and sufficient to strip the defense? I have no idea (but then again, neither do all the posters who claim that there is no way in hell that the defense applies). Are there any Florida cases supporting the notion that self-defense/stand your ground can't apply if someone initiates an encounter (which Zimmerman clearly did) but doesnt't initiate the physical altercation (throw the first punch, or something close to it)? Second, are there any witnesses to the start of the physical altercation? Not "it just doesn't make sense that XYZ happened" theories - those aren't facts - actual witnesses. Because if there aren't, and it's just Zimmerman's word with nothing to contradict it (no witnesses, no physical evidence, etc.), the case won't even make it to a jury. Can Trayvon's girlfriend, from what she heard over the phone, testify as to what happened? Since her statement came almost a month after the incident, is it credible? (In this respect, the shitty job the cops did will buttress her credibility.) Third, can it be established that the cries for help heard on the 911 call came from Trayvon? If so, it goes a long way to attacking Zimmerman's story. But what if it was Zimmerman cryign for help as Trayvon was (understandably) kicking his ass? Seems far-fetched, but I thought I read a report to that effect. That would put a very different spin on things. Overall point being, there are lots of possible outcomes here, and the combination of a shitty law, no eyewitnesses, and an appalling initial investigation could lead to Zimmerman getting off. It wouldn't be right, but it might be legally correct. The notion that this is a clear-cut case, though, is really misplaced. [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics