Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Religion
Reply to "If your church's doctrine says homosexuality is a sin, but your DC is gay"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous] I have family visiting, sorry I’m not here 24/7 like you. It’s very well known that Jesus radicalized as he went on. You didn’t know this? Oh right, you know almost nothing about Christianity besides what you read on atheist, Jewish or fringy sites. But how like you to try to declare “victory” when people get sick of you—I’ve seen this happen so often on DCUM, as if wearing people out with dumb arguments and repetition somehow constitutes “victory.” You’re sad. [/quote] I don’t see this as as “victory/loss” situation. If I did I would declare victory because since you can’t answer my arguments, you have lowered yourself to ad hominem attack. But this is not about winning and losing. It’s about how to get people to relegate Leviticus 18:22 to the trash bin of history so we don’t have posters telling OP that her child must live a celibate life. That issue obviously doesn’t bother you. [/quote] I responded to your question (Jesus' message got more radical later in his career) and you haven't even tried to answer that. Instead you insult me. Yes, you did try to declare "victory." There's somebody in this forum who does this A LOT, complete with spin that twists everything, and I'm guessing it's you. It's really immature, childish, puerile, and any other adjectives you want to apply that aren't ad homimens because they're true. Finally, you're [b]STILL [/b]confused about the role of Leviticus. The vast majority of Christians have [b]ALREADY[/b] relegated it to the dustbin of history, which is [b]EXACTLY [/b]why the majority of us think those who go gback to selectively pull out 18:22 are hypocritical. What you're still doing -- trying to say that parts of Leviticus like the dietary rules are still value--is completely pointless and undermines our shared effort to relegate Leviticus etc. etc. Sory for the bold caps, but in your case it seems necessary.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics