Reply to WOOHOO SB 739 has passed the house- it is on its way to the Governor-

Forum Index » VA Public Schools other than FCPS

Reply to "WOOHOO SB 739 has passed the house- it is on its way to the Governor- "

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]

+2.  And at a cost of how many millions of $$$ to sue a democratically-elected governor, who’s measure follows countless out of state democrat leaders??

The NOVA counties should be ashamed of how poorly they treat our children (and how they waste our tax revenue).[/quote]

[b]I am completely supportive of the use of my taxes to sue Youngkin to protect our children from the selfish ignorant anti maskers on this thread.[/b][/quote]

The forced child maskers really can't give it up - it's purely about ego and anti-scientific, quasi-religious beliefs at this point.  Right now, the so-called disability attorney (who is a closed schooler, which hurt SO MANY disabled kids, just as masks do) is on AEM pushing a hail mary lawsuit.

The same people pushing for this litigation (Smart Restart) are the same people who said:
(1) School was unsafe to reopen during throughout the 2020-2021 school year - they were repeatedly wrong
(2) School was unsafe to open fall 2021 with the Delta variant - they were wrong
(3) School would have to close down in January 2022 because of the Omicron varient - they were wrong
(4) A founder is saying on AEM (the one who said in an NBC interview she sent her son to school with a CO2 monitor) that things will never go back to normal and wearing masks will be a part of our lives forever
(5) On Smart Restart Twitter, that forced child mask wearing needs to happen every time there's a surge in cases for the rest of our lives (i.e., while COVID is still here)

These people have been so wrong. They want children to be forced to mask forever. Their credibility is utterly destroyed and they're a laughing stock of this community.

[/quote]

These people are nuts. The Smart Restart head said on AEM that she'd like to be able to sue parents if a maskless kid infects her child.  LOL

Good luck litigating that the lack of a Paw Patrol mask kept her little snowflake from getting a cold.[/quote]

It is you anti-maskers who are selfish nut cases.  There is still significant  community spread of Covid right now.  Over 2,000 Americans are still dying a day from it.  It is completely reasonable to wear a mask in the close quarters setting of an indoor classroom right now.  May that be different in a few weeks or a month?  I sure hope so but based on the history of this pandemic, there are no guarantees what will happen next.   [/quote]

Oh, honey, please go back to bed. It's going to be a hard couple of weeks for you.

P.S. You don't "hope so."  You love masks and want to do this forever. [/quote]

Your comment is completely ignorant.  Why does recognizing that masks are reasonable precautions right now means that I “love” them and want to wear them forever?

[/quote]

Because you're simply wrong. Masks (mandatory) are not a "reasonable" precaution for "right now." They are an extreme overreach, and people who still advocate for them in the circumstances in which we are today can only be doing so because they simply enjoy masking. There is literally no other explanation.[/quote]

You are the person wrong about masking.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics