Reply to Author's book publication cancelled after a tweet reporting on a WMATA employee eating on the metro

Forum Index » Off-Topic

Reply to "Author's book publication cancelled after a tweet reporting on a WMATA employee eating on the metro"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]I don't get the pile-on here. I didn't see the original tweet, just the backlash for shaming a black woman for eating her breakfast. But the tweet was calling out a WMATA worker for violating WMATA rules that have been around for a long time and have been (apparently until recently) enforced by WMATA and mostly respected by passengers.

Is it really off-limits to point that out? I follow some of the Metro criticism accounts like Unsuck Metro and I think it's good that there is a way for the public to point out where the system is failing. Would the backlash here have been as bad if the tweet had tried to anonymize the WMATA employee? [b]And why are people trying to ruin the woman's life - cancel her book deal, target her kids?[/b][/quote]

Because she tried to ruin another woman's life and get her fired. She knew what her actions would result in by not only tagging a hate account of WMATA (unsuckdcmetro) but also by tagging WMATA - the woman's employer and identifying the train plus train line the woman was on in addition to a very clear photo of her face.

She wanted to publicly mock and vilify the woman in order to get her fired.

Now the rest of twitter is doing the same to her.

I didn't see the tweet about her kids, but I imagine - trying to get an employee fired and getting her book deal canceled pretty much make them even.[/quote]

No, one was breaking her workplace rules, but didn't care. Union. She knows she won't get fired. Maybe not her, but it is also well documented that they sleep on the job.

Another was called horrible for what any DC hall monitor would have done. Come on all you DC hall monitors, can you not relate? Rules are for all of us. Otherwise it's chaos. [/quote]

Actually WMATA issued an edict that not only were the no eating rules not enforceable past May 8th but this particular employee was on her way to her shift with only 20 minutes for a meal break.

So not only was it not breaking workplace rules but this woman was put in this position precisely because of shitty workplace benefits.

[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D6XjUS2WkAAZjxK.jpg[/img]
[img]https://pbs.twimg.com/media/D6ZD-rYUYAAPqz_.jpg[/img]

Of course Natasha Tynes didn't know that. All she knew was that she was a white collar worker in D.C. and sneering down at this woman eating in the same vicinity as herself made her hellish commute to Farragut West just a little more pleasant. Since she was on the train at 9:00am I'm also guessing petty Natasha was late to work. [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics