Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS)
Reply to "New curriculum selection process delayed— new RFP must be issues now"
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]Staff just got this email: This e-mail message is being sent on behalf of Dr. Maria V. Navarro, chief academic officer. Dear Staff: I am writing to provide an update on the curriculum selection process and responses to Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) we have heard from school staff. As you know, earlier this week we decided to postpone the curriculum selection in order to address unanticipated issues in the selection process. However, we are moving ahead with plans to evaluate and select new curricula in K–8 English language arts and mathematics at the beginning of the new school year, and transition to full implementation over a multiple year period. During this delay, we will not only ensure transparency and trust in this process, but also address the feedback we have heard from stakeholders thus far. Below, please find responses to FAQs about the updated Request for Proposal (RFP) process, timelines, and plans for implementation. In addition, although the curriculum acquisition is delayed, professional learning remains a priority in order to ensure the successful transition to new curricula in the years ahead. Regardless of the actual curricular products selected, instructional strategies that meet the needs of every learner, aligned to grade level standards, remain at the core of teaching and learning. As a result, professional learning will continue to focus on these areas and will serve as a foundation for implementation of new curricula. The FAQs below also contain information about professional learning this summer and provides instructions for staff in schools originally selected for implementation. FAQs for Staff 1. Rather than buy a new curriculum why can’t MCPS write their own? There were many lessons learned from Montgomery County Public Schools’ (MCPS) writing of Curriculum 2.0. In 2008, when MCPS began the development of Curriculum 2.0, quality curriculum aligned with the Common Core State Standards were not available. Using teachers and central office MCPS wrote Curriculum 2.0. In the intervening years, not only have quality curricular products become available on the market, but MCPS has a deeper understanding of the infrastructure needed to support a curriculum once it is implemented. For example, it takes a tremendous amount of labor to continuously update curriculum and assessments so that the curriculum does not become stale or static. Using teachers as primary developers of curriculum limits the amount of resources MCPS has to update, maintain, and support the curriculum. It also limits teachers having time to work with their peers on perfecting their craft. A purchased curriculum will come with an infrastructure designed primarily to update and support the curriculum, allowing MCPS content specialist and teachers to focus on supporting teachers as they implement the curriculum. However, even with a purchased curriculum, MCPS teachers will still be needed for curriculum and assessment projects, supplemental curriculum development, and designing and co-leading professional learning. 2. When will a new Request for Proposals (RFP) be issued? A new RFP process will begin in the fall. This will avoid asking for participation from the greater MCPS community during the summer months when many people have set obligations, and vacation plans. 3. If MCPS is delaying the RFP process when will MCPS begin implementing a new curriculum? Building on the feedback from process participants, MCPS will launch the new process in the fall with initial implementation no later than the 2019–2020 school year. 4. Will currently selected schools be the ones to participate in the initial implementation, or will the entire process restart? Schools that were selected will be in the first cohort to implement a new curriculum. Additional opportunities may be available for additional schools. 5. What will MCPS do with the community feedback it has already received? MCPS will use the feedback already received in both crafting a new RFP and in considering any new proposals. 6. Will there still be an opportunity for community input? Yes, there will continue to be opportunities for the community to provide input. 7. Will it be the exact same RFP? No. During the initial process, MCPS received great feedback from stakeholders and the review team about the specific criteria contained in the RFP. This feedback and learning will be used to make revisions to and reissue the RFP. 8. What does this mean for summer professional development? Most teachers in schools originally selected for implementation already had registered for other professional development opportunities in Professional Development Online. In these cases, teachers should remain enrolled in those other training sessions. 9. What if I withdrew from another professional development session and it is now full? If a school was originally selected for implementation and a teacher withdrew on or after May 18, every effort will be made to accommodate those who withdrew. In some cases, additional sections will be added. In other cases, if still unable to register, please contact: o Elementary School: Mrs. Siobhan M. Alexander, director, Elementary Integrated Curriculum Team o Secondary: Mr. Scott W. Murphy, director, Department of Secondary Curriculum and Districtwide Programs In addition, in lieu of the training for new curriculum this summer, optional training opportunities in mathematics and literacy will still be offered for selected schools during the original dates identified. Selected schools will be contacted individually. 10. What about other professional development? All other professional development remains as planned, as listed here: Elementary School: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/164uzZYsxyB_bTW8Qwja5puFftJT-M0q3xiDxJkxR2VY/edit?pli=1#gid=2118346457 Middle School: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1O91ar6FyAcsnYyzL9Kc-Z2bLZ8NMgL_jv05ghgHwx4I/edit?pli=1#gid=882846325 High School: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1rQrDi7idM7oMTh1i3xDFudYys4xuYMgmoUYIUFRCHX8/edit?pli=1#gid=882846325 11. If our school was identified as an Enriched Literacy Center, what does that mean? No change. We will remain in regular communication with you in the coming weeks and months to provide updates about our continued efforts regarding the RFP process, professional development, and plans for implementation. Updates also will be posted periodically on the following link: http://www.montgomeryschoolsmd.org/curriculum/curriculum-review.aspx. Thank you for your continued commitment to students and for all you do every day. Maria V. Navarro, Ed.D. Chief Academic Officer Office of the Chief Academic Officer [/quote] Maria Navarro sounds delusional. No one has been asking MCPS to “just write the new curriculum.” Except maybe for the people in the curriculum office trying to justify their jobs who probably wrote those FAQs for her.[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics