Reply to “We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "“We hold that Roe and Casey must be overruled," Justice Alito writes in an initial majority draft"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The whole sacred talk is awash in religion and we are not a theocracy. My religion does not teach that a fertilized egg is sacred, so keep your laws off my body. [/quote]

You know perfectly well that many abortions occur when the developing child is far more than a fertilized egg. [b]Your terminology makes it easier for women to  view babies as disposable and abort them.[/b][/quote]
DP here. What kind of insanity is this?!

Women are not getting abortions because they are confused about what a fetus is or view babies as disposable. I'd argue, quite the opposite, they are extremely well-aware of what a big responsibility it is to gestate, deliver, and care for a baby. My goodness...how dumb do you think American women are?
[/quote]

The PP wasn't talking about all women , dumbass. Clearly the proponents of abortion are using a change such as "my body, my choice" which precludes the recognition that there is another body/life involved. [/quote]
No, PP pretty clearly said that using terminology that says "fetus =/= child" somehow changes women's understanding of their pregnancies in a way that makes it easier for them to have an abortion. I think that's complete BS. What evidence is there to support it? This view has led to legislation forcing women to undergo unnecessary medical procedures such as transvaginal u/s to force women to see their developing fetus before seeking an abortion. As if they were confused about what's going on in their bodies.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics