Reply to Is there going to be panic selling?

Forum Index » Real Estate

Reply to "Is there going to be panic selling?"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The recent federal workforce reduction proposals, particularly targeting probationary employees, DEI-based contracts, and general federal downsizing, could lead to 64,500 - 114,400 job losses in the Washington, D.C. metro area. This includes 25,500 - 36,400 probationary federal employees who could face termination, 15,000 - 30,000 DEI-related contractor layoffs, and an additional 10,000 - 20,000 contractor losses from broader spending cuts. Reduction in Force  measures could add 10,000 - 18,000 terminations, with 4,000 - 10,000 indirect job losses impacting support roles. These job losses disproportionately affect homeowners, as 50-60% of federal employees and contractors own homes. This means that between 32,000 - 68,000 homeowners in the D.C. metro area may be forced to sell if they cannot secure alternative employment.

While this suggests a potential inventory increase, the return-to-office mandate is driving demand for homes inside the Beltway and in the inner suburbs, mitigating some of the housing supply pressures. Many federal workers moved to outer suburban areas like Prince William, Loudoun, Frederick, and Stafford counties during the pandemic when remote work was dominant. Now, with agencies enforcing 3+ day-per-week office returns, 5-10% of the federal and contractor workforce (~664,000 workers) could decide to move closer to D.C., translating into 33,000 - 66,000 buyers relocating to inside-the-Beltway areas and inner suburbs.

The real estate market inside the Beltway is already experiencing price appreciation, with home values in D.C. proper and inner suburbs like Arlington, Bethesda, Alexandria, Silver Spring, and McLean rising by 8.7% year-over-year. Luxury real estate is particularly in demand due to political appointees, lobbyists, and high-income professionals seeking proximity to the new administration. While an increase in forced sales due to job losses may put some pressure on inventory, the demand from RTO-driven relocations and high-income buyers should offset much of this impact.

If every single affected homeowner (32,000 - 68,000) had to sell and none could secure another job, then theoretically, there could be an oversupply of homes in the inner D.C. region, leading to some downward pressure on prices. However, this is unlikely to occur at such a scale, as many job losses will be staggered over time, and a significant portion of workers will transition into other roles, either within the federal government, private sector, or contracting industry. Given that the estimated RTO-driven demand (33,000 - 66,000 buyers) nearly matches the worst-case forced-seller scenario (32,000 - 68,000 homes entering the market), prices are expected to remain stable or see moderate growth.

Historically, the Washington, D.C. housing market has always had stronger demand inside the Beltway compared to the outer suburbs. Pre-pandemic, areas such as Arlington, Bethesda, Alexandria, McLean, and Silver Spring were highly desirable due to proximity to federal offices, amenities, and strong school districts. However, COVID-19 caused an exodus to the exurbs as remote work became widespread, leading to an artificial surge in demand and prices in areas like Loudoun, Prince William, and Frederick counties. Home price growth in exurban areas exceeded 15% year-over-year at its peak, compared to 14% in traditional suburbs and 10% in urban centers (nowbam.com). With the shift back to in-office work, many of these outer areas are now seeing declining demand, and home values are beginning to correct.

In contrast, inner-Beltway neighborhoods with strong school systems and transit access remain resilient. The fundamental factors that made these areas desirable before COVID (proximity, infrastructure, job access, schools) are still in place. The further out you go from the Beltway, the more home prices will remain flat or decline, as demand softens for pandemic-era commuter belt expansions. Outer exurbs, which saw some of the highest appreciation during COVID, are at the greatest risk of price corrections.

This worst-case scenario assumes that every affected federal employee and contractor (32,000 - 68,000 homeowners) is unable to secure another job and must sell their home, which is highly unlikely. Many will find alternative employment within the federal government, private sector, or through new contracts, reducing the number of forced sales. However, even in this extreme case, the data shows a clear divide in how different areas of the D.C. metro housing market will be impacted.

Outside the Beltway, particularly in the exurbs (Loudoun, Prince William, Frederick, and Stafford counties), home values will likely decline. The pandemic-driven remote work boom artificially inflated demand and home prices in these areas, and with RTO mandates and federal workforce cuts, demand is shifting back toward closer-in locations. The combination of increased supply from job losses and reduced demand from relocating workers is expected to put downward pressure on home prices in these outer regions.

Conversely, inside the Beltway, the market is expected to remain stable or even improve. Demand for homes in areas with good schools, transit access, and proximity to federal offices (such as Arlington, Bethesda, Alexandria, Silver Spring, and McLean) remains strong, driven by RTO relocations, high-income buyers (political appointees, lobbyists, and executives), and the underlying pre-COVID market fundamentals that always made these areas desirable. With 33,000 - 66,000 buyers moving inside the Beltway due to RTO, the impact of forced home sales from job losses should be fully or mostly absorbed by new demand, keeping prices flat to positive.

Bottom line: Even in the most extreme case, the inner-Beltway market is positioned to hold or grow in value, while outer suburban and exurban markets will likely see price declines as demand corrects from its pandemic-era surge.[/quote]
Finally a voice of common sense.[/quote]

The topic of panic selling is being discussed because feds are being laid off. Are you still with me, because this is the part you are missing. No fed or fed contractor or anyone in a fed adjacent job is going to sell their house and rent to be closer to a job they might not have in a week. Your logic is flawed. [/quote]

Is your logic that they called workers back to the office just to fire them in person?[/quote]

You are missing the point. The administration wants to fire the vast majority of current feds because they want a much smaller administrative state that is filled with loyalists. The administration called feds back to the office because they wanted feds to either take FORK or quit out of frustration. The administration is going to keep firing feds and they’re going to keep putting out executive orders to make it easier to fire feds, eliminate programs, and cut spending that they don’t like with contractors. Feds and people in fed adjacent jobs are trying to save money in case they get fired. No one is considering buying a house with a 7% interest rate closer to the office. [/quote]

The claim that the administration will fire the vast majority of federal employees is wildly exaggerated. The total federal workforce is 2.2 million, with 364,000 in the D.C. metro area, making up 15% of the region’s workforce. Even under aggressive cuts, only specific sectors—probationary employees (7-10%), DEI-related contractors (5-10%), and some admin roles—are at risk. Historically, RIFs impact 5-10% of the workforce, not 50-75%, and mass firings face legal and congressional roadblocks.

RTO wasn’t just about pushing people out—it’s happening, and many retained federal employees and contractors are adapting. D.C. metro commutes average 45-60 minutes, and COVID-era movers to Loudoun, Prince William, or Frederick now face 2-3 hour round trips. Many are relocating inside the Beltway (Arlington, Bethesda, McLean, Alexandria) despite 7% mortgage rates because the alternative is wasting hundreds of hours in traffic. Agencies are even offering relocation stipends to retain talent.

The idea that "no one is buying" is just wrong—D.C. home prices are up 8.7% YoY, and inside-the-Beltway markets are holding or appreciating due to demand from lobbyists, executives, and policy professionals. The real housing correction is in the exurbs, where prices surged due to remote work and are now softening as demand shifts back toward the urban core. The claim that the entire market is collapsing ignores real demand trends and the stability of key federal and non-federal job sectors.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics