Reply to Debate Moderator Fact Checks

Forum Index » Political Discussion

Reply to "Debate Moderator Fact Checks"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The “moderators” should have either fact-checked BOTH candidates or neither.  Kamala Harris told some whoppers too:

- Trump *opposes* a national abortion ban.
https://apnews.com/article/republicans-abortion-party-platform-trump-rnc-5561e857c5501df9864ab8ca666d8bc5

- He favors IVF and has even said the government should pay for it, for crying out loud!
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/donald-trump/trump-says-wants-make-ivf-treatments-paid-government-insurance-compani-rcna168804

- He *condemned* the Charlottesville neo-Nazis.  Her claim that he called them “very fine people” has been debunked.
https://www.snopes.com/fact-check/trump-very-fine-people/

Sure would be nice to watch a debate in which both candidates are treated equally. CNN did a good job in this regard.[/quote]

Trump is a serial liar and has been getting away with it for years because nobody's challenged him on it. He's fortunate he got off this lightly. He lost the debate because he doesn't know a single thing about policy. He lost the debate because he has a "concept of a plan" for health care that he started talking about in 2015 (i.e., he's got nothing). He lost because he couldn't control his emotions. He lost because he was talking about the imaginary eating of pets. But he's got MAGA to make excuses for his failure, of course...[/quote]

You don’t have to be “MAGA” to understand that BOTH candidates - or neither - should have been fact-checked.

Honestly, the insistence of some of you in calling anyone who dares to disagree with you or puts out an opinion you don’t like, “MAGA,” is tiresome and telling. Some of you seem to have a very narrow vocabulary that relies on that term way more than it should.  
DP[/quote]

I mean if MAGA is going to continue to spin, spin, spin to make excuses for him, it is what it is. His lies are so egregious that he needed to be fact-checked.[/quote]

Sure.  But fact-checking one candidate and not the other is the very definition of biased moderation. [/quote]

Only if their lies are equal in scale and kind[/quote]

LOL. Muir fact checked Trump one time on the mere fact that he “couldn’t detect the sarcasm” in trumps voice.  What a whopper!   This debate was a total hatchet job. [/quote]

+1
Unfortunately, they were all too eager to fact-check Trump and in doing so, let Harris's lies slip on by.  It did not go unnoticed.  [/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics