Reply to The Blind Side scandal

Forum Index » Entertainment and Pop Culture

Reply to "The Blind Side scandal"

Subject:

Emoticons





More smilies

Text Color: Font: Close Marks

[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]The fact that they picked a conservatorship over an adoption is so suspect. Why would they need to go that route, if not for money?[/quote]

One article I read stated that because Michael was over 18 at the time, traditional adoption was not an option. [/quote]

That is the Tuohy narrative, but it is inaccurate. It was perfectly legal to adopt an 18 year old. They didn't want to.[/quote]

Why would they adopt an 18 year old who already has a mother? Not pursuing an adoption makes complete sense to me. What I don’t understand is why a conservatorship was required for Ole Miss.[/quote]

And why they did not get rid of the conservatorship when he left Ole Miss to play for NFL.[/quote]

There are posts above that are probably right.  The conservatorship was signed by the judge and then likely never used again.  Meaning no bank accounts, no money, no nothing.  It was just used to get past the NCAA.  They did not do or sign anything as part of it.  They did not get rid of it because they probably never thought about it again.[/quote]

Options

	Disable HTML in this message
	Disable BB Code in this message
	Disable smilies in this message

Review message

Search Recent Topics Hottest Topics