Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Relationship Discussion (non-explicit)
Reply to "Holding my boundary. Let him be mad."
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous]In the situation as described, OP did not signal dislike for her child. DH did, but even he held off on a verbal confrontation and did it over text. If there is an agreement in place, as other PPs have said it should be honored and renegotiated calmly and in advance, not waived unilaterally on a whim by one of the parties, even if the agreement could be better. This is doubly true if the trust between the spouses, which is a prerequisite for giving each other grace and having good teamwork, is lost or not there, and needs to be built up. However, to echo a previous PP, OP has issues too. She clearly dislikes her husband and resents him for the unemployment and being an unsupported breadwinner, which colors every interaction with her husband in the most negative light possible. She should own how much her anger and burnout are amplifying the strength and duration of her anger. That is probably more destructive to the relationship long-term than any specific splitting of the day. She's not some crazy career-obsessed automaton who hates her kid, but she is inhabiting the martyr role. Based on OP's update, husband does not think he's in a confrontational situation and has gotten over his tantrum, and offered a deescalation. This is a chance for OP to calmly, kindly say why the text bothered her, or to unleash on him with full anger and bring it back to a fight mode. Her state of mind likely tempts her to the latter but it would be better for the relationship if she took a peaceful way out while still asserting what bothered her, using some of the language in the PPs. [/quote] Op here. This is very thoughtful, thank you [/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics