Toggle navigation
Toggle navigation
Home
DCUM Forums
Nanny Forums
Events
About DCUM
Advertising
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics
FAQs and Guidelines
Privacy Policy
Your current identity is: Anonymous
Login
Preview
Subject:
Forum Index
»
Political Discussion
Reply to "Bombshell: NYT story suggests Alito is the leaker of Dobbs decision "
Subject:
Emoticons
More smilies
Text Color:
Default
Dark Red
Red
Orange
Brown
Yellow
Green
Olive
Cyan
Blue
Dark Blue
Violet
White
Black
Font:
Very Small
Small
Normal
Big
Giant
Close Marks
[quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymous][quote=Anonymrous]Alito is an embarrassment. Yesterday he was "joking" about black kids wearing KKK outfits [twitter]https://twitter.com/therecount/status/1599815390976430081?s=20&t=2XBFNaO-fnfd2bgjLo8PJg[/twitter][/quote] Hint: that’s called SARCASM. Get a clue.[/quote] Joking about Black children wearing KKK outfits is inappropriate from anyone but reprehensible coming from a supreme court justice. I wonder how "high tech lynching" Thomas felt about this "joke' from his good ole buddy. [/quote] The other justice asked about a black kid wearing a KKK outfit, and that was his response. It is no big deal, just manufactured 'outrage'.[/quote] No. Jackson had asked whether a white mall Santa could refuse to take photos with Black kids. Alito stupidly said what about a Black Santa who refuses to take photos with kids wearing KKK outfits, as if that is anyway the same thing. The response was that wearing a costume is not a protected class, while race is. Jackson added that kids wearing KKK costumes aren’t necessarily white. Then Alito made his dumb joke and guffawed like a racist idiot. So his analogy was racist and stupid and his joke was racist and stupid. He is racist and stupid. [/quote] Everyone knows this case is just all BS? The “website designer” has never designed a website. She just thinks she may want to design websites some time in the future and is scared she will have to design a site for gays. [/quote] What? Sounds like you're on the wrong thread. DP[/quote] NP she has never designed a wedding website. Change “website” to “wedding website” and what PP said is about right. She’s preemptively challenging the law in case she’s ever asked to do something she doesn’t want to do, in an effort to make it legal to discriminate against gay people. https://www.cpr.org/2022/12/01/this-colorado-web-designer-doesnt-want-to-make-wedding-sites-for-same-sex-couples-the-u-s-supreme-court-will-decide-whether-thats-legal/[/quote]
Options
Disable HTML in this message
Disable BB Code in this message
Disable smilies in this message
Review message
Search
Recent Topics
Hottest Topics